
A: Good morning, Daisy.
B: Morning, Li Ming! Do you have any plans for the future?
A: Of course! ____1___
B: Wow, sounds interesting! But I remember you were in the swimming club. When did you get interested in robots?
A: I have always loved robots. Sometimes I try making some simple robots by myself.
B: ____2___
A: Yes, I’ve been learning robotics since I was in Grade 7. You must have known that a humanoid robot (人形机器人) has made history by finishing a half-marathon for the first time in Beijing.
B: Oh, I watched the marathon on TV. ____3___
A: Sure, it is. I’d like to learn more about it. ____4____
B: Me? Emm, I want to study and design Chinese Hanfu. You know how much I love these beautiful clothes.
A: Fantastic! And one day you might set up a Hanfu factory in your country.
B: You’re right. Maybe the robots you create will wear the fashionable Hanfu I design in the future.
A: Haha, ____5____ Let’s work together to make a more wonderful world!
A. Have you ever learned robotics?
B. I want to join the swimming club!
C. What about you, Daisy?
D. I hope our dreams will come true.
E. One of my goals is to join a robotic club.
F. What an amazing race!
1.1.
A
B
C
D
解析:选E。第 1 题:E(One of my goals is to join a robotic club.) 题型:上下文衔接 + 语义匹配 解析:前文黛西询问 “未来计划”,后文围绕 “机器人” 展开,E 选项明确表达 “加入机器人俱乐部” 的目标,与上下文话题一致;B 选项(加入游泳俱乐部)与后文 “对机器人感兴趣” 矛盾,其余选项均不贴合 “未来计划” 的提问。
2.2.
A
B
C
D
解析:选A。第 2 题:A(Have you ever learned robotics?) 题型:疑问句式 + 语境回应 解析:后文李明回答 “Yes, I’ve been learning robotics since...”,可知前文是一般疑问句,且核心话题为 “学习机器人技术”,A 选项符合句式和语义要求;其余选项均非一般疑问句,或与 “学习机器人技术” 无关。
3.3.
A
B
C
D
解析:选F。第 3 题:F(What an amazing race!) 题型:情感表达 + 上下文呼应 解析:前文提到 “人形机器人完成半程马拉松”,黛西表示 “在电视上看过”,后文李明回应 “Sure, it is.(确实如此)”,F 选项是对马拉松比赛的感叹,符合情感逻辑;G 选项(你觉得机器人怎么样)与后文回应不衔接,其余选项语义不符。
4.4.
A
B
C
D
解析:选C。第 4 题:C(What about you, Daisy?) 题型:话题转换 + 疑问表达 解析:前文李明分享了自己的计划(了解机器人相关),后文黛西回答自己的梦想(设计汉服),C 选项用于询问对方的情况,实现话题自然转换;其余选项均无法引出黛西的个人计划。
5.5.
A
B
C
D
解析:选D。第 5 题:D(I hope our dreams will come true.) 题型:情感总结 + 上下文衔接 解析:前文二人畅想 “机器人穿汉服”,后文提到 “共同创造美好世界”,D 选项表达对双方梦想的期盼,起到承上启下的作用;其余选项均无法呼应 “梦想” 主题及后文的合作愿景。