高考真题2025年全国Ⅰ卷阅读理解C- 被汽车占领的街道:我们失去了什么?
高考真题2025年全国Ⅰ卷阅读理解C- 被汽车占领的街道:我们失去了什么?

While safety improvements might have been made to our streets in recent years, transport studies also show declines in pedestrian (行人) mobility, especially among young children. Many parents say there’s too much traffic on the roads for their children to walk safely to school, so they pack them into the car instead.

Dutch authors Thalia Verkade and Marco te Brömmelstroet are bothered by facts like these. In their new book Movement: How to Take Back Our Streets and Transform Our Lives, they call for a rethink of our streets and the role they play in our lives.

Life on city streets started to change decades ago. Whole neighbourhoods were destroyed to make way for new road networks and kids had to play elsewhere. Some communities fought back. Most famously, a Canadian journalist who had moved her family to Manhattan in the early 1950s led a campaign to stop the destruction of her local park. Describing her alarm at its proposed replacement with an expressway, Jane Jacobs called on her mayor (市长) to champion “New York as a decent place to live, and not just rush through.” Similar campaigns occurred in Australia in the late 1960s and 1970s as well.

Although these campaigns were widespread, the reality is that the majority of the western cities were completely redesigned around the needs of the motor car. The number of cars on roads has been increasing rapidly. In Australia we now have over twenty million cars for just over twenty-six million people, among the highest rate of car ownership in the world.

We invest a lot in roads that help us rush through, but we fail to account for the true costs. Do we really recognise what it costs us as a society when children can’t move safely around our communities? The authors of Movement have it right: it’s time to think differently about that street outside your front door.

1.1. What phenomenon does the author point out in paragraph 1?

A Cars often get stuck on the road.

B Traffic accidents occur frequently.

C People walk less and drive more.

D Pedestrians fail to follow the rules.

解析:选C。C细节理解题。第一段提到“transport studies also show declines in pedestrian mobility...so they pack them into the car instead”,表明行人流动性下降,家长因交通拥堵让孩子坐车上学,即人们走路少了,开车多了,所以选C。

2.2. What were the Canadian journalist and other campaigners trying to do?

A Keep their cities livable.

B Promote cultural diversity.

C Help the needy families.

D Make expressways accessible.

解析:选A。A细节理解题。文中提到“a Canadian journalist...led a campaign to stop the destruction of her local park...called on her mayor to champion ‘New York as a decent place to live’”,说明加拿大记者和其他活动家是为了让城市适宜居住,故选A。

3.3. What can be inferred about the campaigns in Australia in the late 1960s and 1970s?

A They boosted the sales of cars.

B They turned out largely ineffective.

C They won government support.

D They advocated building new parks.

解析:选B。B推理判断题。文中说“Although these campaigns were widespread, the reality is that the majority of the western cities were completely redesigned around the needs of the motor car”,表明尽管澳大利亚在20世纪60年代末和70年代有类似运动,但西方城市大多还是围绕汽车需求重新设计,说明这些运动基本上没有成效,选B。

4.4. What can be a suitable title for the text?

A Why the Rush?

B What’s Next?

C Where to Stay?

D Who to Blame?

解析:选A。A主旨大意题。文章主要讨论了城市街道为满足汽车需求而重新设计,导致行人出行不便等问题,人们为了赶时间投资道路建设却忽视了真正的成本,“Why the Rush?”能很好地体现对这种现象的反思,作为标题最合适,所以选A。