As has been all too apparent in recent days at Balcombe, few issues cause greater concern than energy policy. Many village communities feel their countryside is being ruined by the power-producing machines of wind farms; yet they never take “direct action”, even though the planning laws put them at a severe disadvantage. And the generous subsidies (财政补贴) , which encourage the expansion of wind power, are not favorable to the village communities and set landowners in conflict with other residents (居民) .

       Those who disagree with the rapid expansion of wind farms state that the damage they cause is out of proportion(比例) to the benefits they bring, because their energy output cannot match that of the carbon-based power stations they are supposed to replace. Supporters insist that wind must be part of a mix of renewables, nuclear and carbon, and that the country is committed to meeting EU (European Union) targets for non-carbon energy generation.

       Against this background, the fact that there is an argument within the Government over whether to publish an official report on wind farms’ impact on the countryside becomes even more extraordinary. The two parties in the coalition (联合) government are in disagreement over what it should say.

       We have some advice for the two parties: publish the report, and let the country be the judge.  Even if it contains evidence that wind farms are harmful, it will hardly be a pleasant surprise to people who do not like them. Equally, supporters must argue their case by acknowledging the concerns and explaining why they are either misplaced or worthy of much attention.

       The suggestion that further negotiations are to take place to produce an “acceptable” report suggests that the politics of coalition government are doing the country harm in a certain way. Given the sensitivities involved, all the information should be available so that people can reach their own conclusions, rather than being left with the suspicion（猜疑）that facts are being replaced by political beliefs.

1.72. We can learn from the first paragraph that________.

A energy policy catches much attention of the public

B the residents are in favor of the expansion of wind farms

C many village communities are satisfied with the subsidies

D the planning laws offer great benefits to the residents

解析：选A。【解析】推理判断题。根据文章首句As has been all too apparent in recent days at Balcombe, few issues cause greater concern than energy policy.可知没有什么问题比energy policy能让人们更加为之担忧了，即energy policy最让人们担心的问题。所以A项正确。

2.73. Supporters think that the expansion of wind power______.

A is more rapid than that of carbon-based power

B guarantees an increase in energy output

C is expected to be much better than that of nuclear power

D agrees with EU targets for non-carbon energy generation

解析：选D。【解析】推理判断题。由文章第二段最后一句Supporters insist that wind must be part of a mix of renewables, nuclear and carbon, and that the country is committed to meeting EU ( European Union) targets for non-carbon energy generation.可知支持者认为风电项目的扩建是符合欧盟无碳排放的标准的。故D项贴切。

3.74. It can be inferred from the passage that_____.

A an official report will settle the energy problem

B the two parties are divided over the issue of wind farms

C the two parties have agreed on a further negotiation

D political beliefs concerning energy issue go against facts

解析：选B。【解析】推理判断题。根据文章第二段Those who disagree with the rapid expansion ….和 Supporters insist that wind must be part of a mix of renewables…可知双方对于风电项目的扩建的观点存在分歧。所以选B。

4.75. Which of the following reflects the author’s opinion?

A Increase political impact on energy policy.

B Release a statement of supporters on wind farms.

C Let the nation judge the facts about wind power.

D Leave the two parties to reach their own conclusions.

解析：选C。【解析】推理判断题。根据文章第四段第一句We have some advice for the two parties: publish the report, and let the country be the judge.可知作者自己的看法是：如实报道这个问题，以便人们对此进行讨论并做出决择。故C最贴切。